Episode 142: “Will the Lost Remain Alive in Hell Forever?” Chris Date and Ross Burns Debate Hell

Rethinking Hell contributor Chris Date debates traditionalist Ross Burns on Zac Sechler’s “Adherent Apologetics” YouTube channel, debating the question, “Will the Lost Remain Alive in Hell Forever?”

Continue reading “Episode 142: “Will the Lost Remain Alive in Hell Forever?” Chris Date and Ross Burns Debate Hell”

Episode 141: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 3

Rethinking Hell contributor Darren Clark and friend of the ministry Johnathan Pritchett (VP for Academics at Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary) join Chris Date to review his debate versus Tony Costa on Chris Arnzen’s “Iron Sharpens Iron” radio program. In this episode, Darren, Johnathan, and Chris discuss part 3 of the debate, in which Date and Costa field audience questions.

Continue reading “Episode 141: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 3”

Episode 140: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 2

Rethinking Hell contributor Darren Clark and friend of the ministry Johnathan Pritchett (VP for Academics at Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary) join Chris Date to review his debate versus Tony Costa on Chris Arnzen’s “Iron Sharpens Iron” radio program. In this episode, Darren, Johnathan, and Chris discuss part 2 of the debate, in which Date and Costa debate the question, “Is conscious torment of the damned eternal?”

Continue reading “Episode 140: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 2”

Episode 139: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 1

Rethinking Hell contributor Darren Clark and friend of the ministry Johnathan Pritchett (VP for Academics at Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary) join Chris Date to review his debate versus Tony Costa on Chris Arnzen’s “Iron Sharpens Iron” radio program. In this episode, Darren, Johnathan, and Chris discuss part 1 of the debate, in which Date and Costa debate the question, “Is immortality only given to the saved?”

Continue reading “Episode 139: Date vs. Costa on Hell; Debate Review, Part 1”

Episode 138: The History of Hell–A Conversation With Bart Ehrman

Rethinking Hell contributor Chris Date is joined by Dr. Bart Ehrman to discuss Ehrman’s latest book, Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife.

Dr. Ehrman is an influential agnostic and critic of the Christian faith, especially in the area of the reliability of the biblical documents. Despite our significant differences, we decided that it was important to critically engage with Dr. Ehrman’s work on the subject of Hell. Obviously, this should not be seen as our endorsement of Dr. Ehrman’s critical work and perspectives, just as Dr. Ehrman isn’t endorsing our work or beliefs, even though we find some points of agreement in this conversation.

Continue reading “Episode 138: The History of Hell–A Conversation With Bart Ehrman”

Episode 137: The Apocalyptic Paul, with Nick Quient

Former Rethinking Hell contributor Nick Quient joins Chris Date to discuss Nick’s recent book, The Perfection of Our Faithful Wills: Paul’s Apocalyptic Vision of Entire Sanctification, and how the apocalyptic theology of the apostle Paul supports conditional immortality and challenges the doctrines of eternal torment and universalism.

Continue reading “Episode 137: The Apocalyptic Paul, with Nick Quient”

Episode 136: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 5)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains the fifth and final part of their discussion; listen to episodes 132 through 135 for the first four parts.

Continue reading “Episode 136: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 5)”

Episode 135: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 4)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains part 4 of their discussion; the next episode will contain the final installment of the series.

Continue reading “Episode 135: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 4)”

Episode 134: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 3)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains part 3 of their discussion; the next one or two episodes will contain the remainder of the series.

Continue reading “Episode 134: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 3)”

Episode 133: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 2)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains part 2 of their discussion; the next two or three episodes will contain the remainder of the series.

Continue reading “Episode 133: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 2)”