RH Default Feature Image

Episode 49: 2014 Book and Conference Teaser

Episode 49: 2014 Book and Conference TeaserEpisode 49: 2014 Book and Conference TeaserRethinking Hell: Readings in Evangelical Conditionalism editors and contributors gather for a supersized episode of the podcast to share details about the 2014 Wipf & Stock publication, and July’s inaugural Rethinking Hell conference!

Rethinking Hell Book and Conference Links

Rethinking Hell Book Announcement
https://rethinkinghell.com/2013/12/rethinking-hell-book-announcement
Rethinking Hell Conference Announcement
https://rethinkinghell.com/2013/12/rethinking-hell-2014-conference-announcement
Conference Website, with Details, Call for Papers, and Registration
http://www.rethinkinghellconference.com
Liked it? Take a second to support Rethinking Hell on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Chris Date

Chris Date

Chris Date is Adjunct Professor of Bible and Theology at Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary and co-editor of Rethinking Hell: Readings in Evangelical Conditionalism (Cascade, 2014) and A Consuming Passion (Pickwick, 2015). A full-time software engineer, Chris believes theology and apologetics are for every average joe in the pews, and not just for pastors, philosophers, PhD’s and the erudite in ivory towers. Formerly a traditionalist, he became convinced of the biblical view of final punishment over the course of a process which began when he interviewed Edward Fudge, and he has since defended the view in several debates and on Justin Brierley's Unbelievable? radio program on Premier Christian Radio UK. Chris is also a steward of the Rethinking Hell project.
All Articles

One thought on “Episode 49: 2014 Book and Conference Teaser”

  1. I hope all goes well at the upcoming conference. Unfortunately, I cannot attend.
    It is encouraging to see annihilaitonism/conditional immortality gaining more traction in Protestant circles. Luther, Calvin and Arminius don’t have the final say on the nature of final punishment. The reformation needs to continue with reconsidering the doctrine of “hell”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *