RH LIVE! Episode 32: What the Bible Really Says About Dual Resurrection

In this episode of Rethinking Hell Live, Chris Date discusses what the Bible really says about dual resurrection, the truth that one day both saved and lost will be raised bodily from the dead. Chris looks at two seemingly contradictory sets of biblical texts: those which explicitly affirm dual resurrection, and those that explicitly or implicitly deny the wicked will be raised. Then, Chris argues that harmonizing or reconciling these texts requires belief in conditional immortality, according to which the unsaved will be raised mortal and literally die a second time, never to live again.

– Peter Grice’s article, “The Neglected Doctrines of Resurrection and Bodily Transformation”: http://rethinkinghell.com/2017/12/12/the-neglected-doctrines-of-resurrection-and-bodily-transformation/

 

Episode 137: The Apocalyptic Paul, with Nick Quient

Former Rethinking Hell contributor Nick Quient joins Chris Date to discuss Nick’s recent book, The Perfection of Our Faithful Wills: Paul’s Apocalyptic Vision of Entire Sanctification, and how the apocalyptic theology of the apostle Paul supports conditional immortality and challenges the doctrines of eternal torment and universalism.

Continue reading “Episode 137: The Apocalyptic Paul, with Nick Quient”

RH LIVE! Episode 30: Raised to Die Again? An Interview with Randal Rauser

In this episode of Rethinking Hell Live, Chris Date interviews annihilationist Randal Rauser on the terminology of “conditional immortality” and “annihilationism,” and on what he thinks is the biggest ethical/theology challenge to conditionalism/annihilationism.

– Randal Rauser’s website: https://randalrauser.com/

– The website of Taylor Seminary: http://www.taylor-edu.ca/

– Randal Rauser’s video presenting the challenge: https://randalrauser.com/2020/04/whats-the-biggest-problem-with-annihilationism/

– Joey Dear’s article positing an answer: http://rethinkinghell.com/2012/07/22/double-jeopardy-why-raise-the-dead-only-to-destroy-them/

 

Episode 136: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 5)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains the fifth and final part of their discussion; listen to episodes 132 through 135 for the first four parts.

Continue reading “Episode 136: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 5)”

Episode 135: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 4)

Rethinking Hell contributors William Tanksley and Darren Clark join Chris Date to critique Greg Koukl and Tim Barnett’s article series at Stand to Reason called “Hell Interrupted.” This episode contains part 4 of their discussion; the next episode will contain the final installment of the series.

Continue reading “Episode 135: Conditionalism Stands to Reason (Part 4)”